On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:

> I have Scientific Word 2.5.  It's an ok program, but IMO not as
> good as LyX.  It's similar in many aspects, since it's built
> on top of LaTeX.  It imports LaTeX to a (very) limited degree.
[...] 
> There are a few areas where they are ahead of us, but in many
> others, they are trailing us by far.

It would be interesting to have a more complete comparison. Years ago I
was a heavy user of SciWord 2.0. In fact I started to use LyX (and wrote
Mathed) because there was not SciWord for linux.

Alejandro 

Reply via email to