On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > I have Scientific Word 2.5. It's an ok program, but IMO not as > good as LyX. It's similar in many aspects, since it's built > on top of LaTeX. It imports LaTeX to a (very) limited degree. [...] > There are a few areas where they are ahead of us, but in many > others, they are trailing us by far. It would be interesting to have a more complete comparison. Years ago I was a heavy user of SciWord 2.0. In fact I started to use LyX (and wrote Mathed) because there was not SciWord for linux. Alejandro
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Larry S. Marso
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Jochen Kuepper
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Amir Karger
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jochen Kuepper
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Larry S. Marso
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Andre' Poenitz
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jochen Kuepper
- Re: Three pre-versions of P... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Garst R. Reese
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Three pre-versions ... Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: Three pre-versions of PR doc Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
- latexconf? (Was Re: Three pre-versions of PR... Liisa Vermeer
- Re: latexconf? (Was Re: Three pre-versio... Larry S. Marso