> - Which one do you prefer? (why?)
I prefer the last one, because it explains the WYSIWYM principle the best.
I understand Larry's point that cut/paste can be dangerous, but I
think the text is coherent.
> - Which "point editings" (i.e. no large reorganizations, but e.g. paragraph
> switches at most) are needed on that?
There are a few typos: "ar" -> "are".
Latex -> LaTeX.
What You See Is What you MEAN -> What You See Is What You Mean.
--
As some of you know, I use Microsoft Windows daily, and in particular
Word. The other day I noticed that Microsoft Word actually is introducing
more and more of the logical editing. They have a so called "online layout"
view, which works pretty much like the LyX window: The breaking of lines
on the screen is not WYSIWYG, and they have a hyperlinking TOC thing at
the right hand side of the screen.
Still, it does not "inline" footnotes, and there are a few other things
missing to get a real WYSIWYM environment. But it's worth keeping an
eye on, because it seems that others begin to notice the advantage of
taking advantage of the screen.
Word is an excellent application to use, if you have tried LyX first.
Then you know how to use Word in the right way. (This might be something
worth touting at some point: Using LyX educates you to use your other
word processor better ;-)
Greets,
Asger
