Okay, I've got to ask. What exactly does gpg2 offer that makes it more suitable than gpg for most usage?
There should be a /feature/ comparison, where is it? gpg 1.x is still maintained, it works and the vast majority of users /seem/ to use it and only it. I compiled gpg2 to make a 16384 length key... but that turned out to be completely painful, if not, almost impossible to use. Besides RSA keys are the past, but maybe not so if so many people are only using gpg (v1.x) A.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main
