Tim Connors via luv-main <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2016, Trent W. Buck wrote: > >> Andrew McGlashan via luv-main >> <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > On 7/04/2016 2:22 AM, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote: >> >> So my plan now is to use something simple for sending GPG encrypted mail >> >> (which is a small portion of my email) and use Kmail for the majority of >> >> mail >> >> for which it works quite well. >> > >> > Simple? Is this simple enough? >> > >> > $ gpg -e -s -a --default-key B7EFE2FB \ >> > -r [email protected]| \ >> > mailx -s 'test gpg cli' [email protected] \ >> > -b [email protected] >> >> Why does everyone *still* use gnupg 1.x ? > > 'cause that's what's in Debian?
Both are, since forever. bash4$ rmadison -aamd64 gnupg gnupg2 debian: gnupg | 1.4.10-4+squeeze4 | squeeze-security | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.10-4+squeeze4 | squeeze | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.12-7+deb7u7 | wheezy-security | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.12-7+deb7u7 | wheezy | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.18-7+deb8u1 | jessie | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.20-5 | stretch | amd64 gnupg | 1.4.20-5 | sid | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.14-2+squeeze2 | squeeze-security | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.14-2+squeeze2 | squeeze | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.19-2+deb7u2 | wheezy-security | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.19-2+deb7u2 | wheezy | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.25-1~bpo70+1 | wheezy-backports | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.0.26-6 | jessie | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.1.11-6 | stretch | amd64 gnupg2 | 2.1.11-6 | sid | amd64 _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main
