On 11/04/2016 4:24 PM, Brian May via luv-main wrote:
> Andrew McGlashan via luv-main <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> What exactly does gpg2 offer that makes it more suitable than gpg for
>> most usage?
> 
> I believe they rewrote gnupg-agent to actually make it secure - like
> ssh-agent - instead of just storing your passphase it stores the private
> key and denies any processes getting direct access to the unencrypted
> private key. This also has other advantages apart from just security.

I use 0 minutes to cache my passphrase, so that should make me safe?

Every single time I want to decrypt something or sign something, then I
must enter my passphrase; this is quite deliberate and exactly how I
want it.

> However, I haven't used gpg2 enough yet to know how to use this just
> yet.

Okay.

Thanks
AndrewM

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to