2009/9/21 Leandro Gómez <leo.tel...@gmail.com>: > 2009/9/21, Søren Bredlund Caspersen <soeren....@gmail.com>: >> 2009/9/21 Leandro Gómez <leo.tel...@gmail.com>: >>> 2009/9/20 Søren Bredlund Caspersen <soeren....@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > The attribution information is included in the source files. >>>> >>>> Upon closer inspection, I see that now. >>>> However, to make the use of these buttons more easy, maybe it should >>>> be more explicit at the wiki page - but that is a minor issue. >>> >>> Yes, you're right...my mistake :) >>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > If you have limited space, please don't use this graphics. It's as >>>> > simple as >>>> > that... ok... I'm the original author of the artwork, but if I weren't >>>> > I >>>> > would always think the same way: >>>> >>>> Don't get me wrong here. I brought up the issue because the licensed >>>> work is being miss used. I don't want to throw any specific links out >>>> there, but go surfing planet ubuntu, and you will find people using >>>> these graphics, but not attributing you as the original author. That >>>> to me is a clear violation of the license, and I wanted to shine some >>>> light on the issue - and possibly figure out if I had misunderstood >>>> the license at some point. >>> >>> I understand the license this way: >>> >>> If you're using the graphics for promoting the event, it's ok to not >>> attribute the author. It's the UGJ we're promoting and there's no need to >>> link to the authors site. >>> >>> But, if you're distributing the artwork or making derivated use of it, >>> then >>> you must attribute. >> >> Can someone please confirm this? If you use these graphics to promote >> the event, you don't have to live up to the license requirement of >> attribution? Can there be made this kind of exceptions from the CC >> license? > > From the CC website: > > "If the work itself contains any copyright notices placed there by the > copyright holder, you must leave those notices in tact, or reproduce > them in a way that is reasonable to the medium in which you are > re-publishing the work." > > The work itself (the .png graphic) doesn't contain any copyright > notice, so IMHO you're not violating the license. > > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FFAQ#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative_Commons_licensed_work.3F >
Great! Thanks! :) >> >> Cheers >> Søren >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> If we as a community can't respect the license imposed by people >>>> inside our own community on artwork, how can we the expect others >>>> respect the license of the software, that seems to be so central to >>>> the whole Free Software movement? >>> >>> I totally agree with you on this. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> > It doesn't matter if it's code, artwork, literature or music; the >>>> > author >>>> > must always be acknowleged... just because they've made the software, >>>> > book, >>>> > web banner or song available to the public for free, does'nt mean they >>>> > don't >>>> > deserve to be acknowledged for their hard work. >>>> > >>>> > If I follow your logic correctly, we should be removing all the >>>> > copyright >>>> > notices from the software we use, because it takes more disk space and >>>> > can >>>> > become unhandy. >>>> >>>> In my other mail I specifically tried to argued that those two can't >>>> be compared. A few lines of text on one piece of paper take up a much >>>> bigger fraction of the face of the paper, than a text document on a >>>> harddisk. >>> >>> Usually, the copyright notice take up a tiny fraction of the brochure, >>> poster, cd label,or whatever. I'm sure that you can make some space for >>> it. >>> :) >>> >>>> >>>> > I don't want to be harsh, but if you're not going to respect the >>>> > license, do >>>> > your own artwork and publish it as PD or CC0. >>>> >>>> I think you miss understand me. I _do_ want to respect the license >>>> chosen by you (and other publishers). That is the whole reason why I >>>> bring up this subject. >>>> >>>> However I think more people would be able to use the graphics if >>>> another license was chosen. But of course the choice of license is >>>> solely for the author! >>> >>> The reason I choose CC-BY-SA was that it was the most common license on >>> the >>> SU site. But I'm willing to change it if you feel that the current license >>> prevents people from using the artwork. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Søren >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> The loco mailing list may not be the right forum for it, but maybe >>>> >> there needs to be a general discussion of what license to use for >>>> >> marketing material? Or it has already been had, and I have missed it? >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers >>>> >> Søren >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Best, >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Greg >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > [0] http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ >>>> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Cheers >>>> >> >> Søren >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> 2009/8/21 Leandro Gómez <leo.tel...@gmail.com>: >>>> >> >> > 2009/8/21 Jono Bacon <j...@ubuntu.com> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> On 08/21/2009 12:10 PM, Leandro Gómez wrote: >>>> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> > Corrales to weave his magic? ;-) >>>> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> > Yes indeed! Would anyone like to do these? Adolfo, could you >>>> >> >> >> > ask >>>> >> >> >> > Byron >>>> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> > Made some badges based on Byron's artwork... threw in a couple >>>> >> >> >> > of >>>> >> >> >> > web >>>> >> >> >> > banners as well... download (including sources) here: >>>> >> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> > http://www.mediafire.com/?gii7ghtym1y >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> Those images look awesome! Good you attach them and add them to >>>> >> >> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGlobalJam - thanks!* >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Done! :) >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> * >>>> >> >> >> Jono >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> -- >>>> >> >> >> Jono Bacon >>>> >> >> >> Ubuntu Community Manager >>>> >> >> >> www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org >>>> >> >> >> www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> -- >>>> >> >> >> loco-contacts mailing list >>>> >> >> >> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > -- >>>> >> >> > loco-contacts mailing list >>>> >> >> > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> -- >>>> >> >> loco-contacts mailing list >>>> >> >> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> >> > >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > loco-contacts mailing list >>>> >> > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> loco-contacts mailing list >>>> >> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > loco-contacts mailing list >>>> > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> loco-contacts mailing list >>>> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>> >>> >>> -- >>> loco-contacts mailing list >>> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >>> >>> >> >> -- >> loco-contacts mailing list >> loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts >> > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > -- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
