jankratochvil added a comment. In D96778#2565414 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778#2565414>, @werat wrote:
> I can't claim I fully understand what's the difference here, but this aligns > with your comment at https://reviews.llvm.org/D92643#inline-900717 :) If interested the problem was `DWARFAttributes` can contain attributes collected from multiple DIEs (linked by `DW_AT_specification` or `DW_AT_abstract_origin`). And with (future) DWZ patchset applied for LLDB such DIEs can come from multiple CUs. Therefore it is not enough to assume each attribute comes from CU of the original DIE. Without DWZ it is sure not a bug. And DWZ is not yet in LLDB. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D96778 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
