zturner added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005#1109761, @JDevlieghere wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005#1109693, @zturner wrote: > > > FWIW, I think the single biggest improvement one could make to the LLDB > > test suite runtime is to compile all inferiors up front as part of the > > CMake step. If you run the test suite twice every inferior is > > unnecessarily compiled twice. > > > I'm a big proponent of moving as much logic as possible into the > configuration stage, but a common use case (at least for us) is testing a > single build with a different compiler/configuration. Then the configure / CMake stage could build all inferiors with every possible configuration you want to test, each one writing to a different output directory. Sorta like how in LLVM you can specify `LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86,ARM,...` you could specify something like `LLDB_TEST_INFERIOR_CONFIGS=gcc-x64;gcc-x86;clang-arm64`. Obviously this is a big change and a lot of work, but I think it would make the test suite run in under 30 seconds https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
