JDevlieghere added a comment. I've given this some more though as I see valid points and concerns on both sides of the argument. I'm leaning towards running test cases in parallel because it offloads more work to lit at negligible cost (running make and launching the inferior are the biggest time consumers).
Other advantages are that: - It would also make it at lot easier to rerun a single test case because lit is in a better position to inform us how to reproduce a failure. - It would give a more granular overview of what passed, failed or skipped. The cmake bot on GreenDragon runs the test suite with lit and that means that failures are only reported at file level, which imho is to coarse. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
