On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:19 AM Adrian Prantl <apra...@apple.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > But is there a reason why that is more valuable with LLDB than it is with > LLVM? In LLVM when a test fails it stops and doesn't run subsequent run > lines. So you have the same issue there. > > > That's not a good analogy. Multiple RUN lines don't necessarily mean > separate tests, they mean separate commands being executed that may depend > on each other. As Pavel pointed out before, this would be closer to how > gtests behave. > > -- adrian > The analogy I was going for is better illustrated in https://reviews.llvm.org/D46318. Here we have multiple distinct tests that are similar enough to be in the same file. lit runs them sequentially and stops as soon as any of the first one fails.
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
