JDevlieghere added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005#1109693, @zturner wrote:
> FWIW, I think the single biggest improvement one could make to the LLDB test > suite runtime is to compile all inferiors up front as part of the CMake step. > If you run the test suite twice every inferior is unnecessarily compiled > twice. I'm a big proponent of moving as much logic as possible into the configuration stage, but a common use case (at least for us) is testing a single build with a different compiler/configuration. > I think that would shave off up to 75% of the test suite runtime. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46005 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
