Hi Scott,

please see my comments inline.

On 06/15/2013 06:13 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 06/14/2013 02:15:59 AM, Minghuan Lian wrote:
1. Only MSIIR1 can index 16 MSI registers, but when using MSIIR1
the IRQs of a register are not continuous. for example, the first
register irq values are 0x0, 0x10, 0x20, 0x30 ... 0x1f0. So it
is hard to use 'msi-available-ranges' property to indicate the
available ranges and 'msi-available-ranges' property has been
removed from dts node, so this patch removes the related code.

2. Add 'msiregs' kernel parameter instead of 'msi-available-ranges'
functionality.

The reason we used a device tree property was because this is for virtualization and AMP scenarios where this instance of Linux does not own all of the MSI registers.

I don't see any reasonable way to partition an MPIC v4.3 MSI group -- but there are more groups, so it's not that bad. What's the use case for this patch?

[Minghuan] I do not known any case about this patch. I add 'msiregs' just for achieving "msi-available-ranges" functionality. I do not want to remove partition functionality when updating to mpic4.3, although I do not see virtualization and AMP cases on T4(KVM does not need this functionality). If you hope to keep 'msi-available-ranges' property for older mpic, can I add 'msi-available-regs' property for mpic4.3. Using 'msi-available-regs' to implement partition is similar to 'msi-available-ranges'. When considering the consistency, 'msi-available-regs' is better than msiregs.
-Scott


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to