On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It appears that this turns out to interact badly with the probing of > PPC_UDBG_16550, which is always enabled on PPC405 (and apparently > found!) even though Virtex devices don't have them.
What is the symptom? g. > > Steve > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stephen Neuendorffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:25 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >> Cc: Stephen Neuendorffer >> Subject: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Xilinx: add compatibility for 'simple-bus'. >> >> ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for >> busses which cannot be probed for devices. In addition, the Xilinx >> versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating. Hence, in the future >> let's prefer to use the standard names. I've left the old names in >> for short term backward compatibility for existing device trees. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c >> index 6c72994..b1ab7b8 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ >> #include <asm/xilinx_intc.h> >> >> static struct of_device_id xilinx_of_bus_ids[] __initdata = { >> + { .compatible = "simple-bus", }, >> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.00.a", }, >> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.02.a", }, >> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v34-1.01.a", }, >> -- >> 1.5.3.4 -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
