On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ePAPR drafts propose 'simple-bus' as a generic compatibility type for
> busses which cannot be probed for devices. In addition, the Xilinx
> versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating. Hence, in the future
> let's prefer to use the standard names. I've left the old names in
> for short term backward compatibility for existing device trees.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll queue this up for .27
Cheers,
g.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
> index 6c72994..b1ab7b8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/40x/virtex.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <asm/xilinx_intc.h>
>
> static struct of_device_id xilinx_of_bus_ids[] __initdata = {
> + { .compatible = "simple-bus", },
> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.00.a", },
> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v46-1.02.a", },
> { .compatible = "xlnx,plb-v34-1.01.a", },
> --
> 1.5.3.4
>
>
>
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
