On Thu, 8 May 2008 10:18:50 +1000 David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:47:31PM -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > > The IBM coreconnect names are pretty well defined, it appears. In > > addition, the Xilinx versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating. > > Hence, in the future let's prefer to use the standard names. I've > > left the old names in for some backward compatibility for existing > > device trees. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you're talking about future trees, can't you just slap "simple-bus" > on them avoid this monster id table? What is that and how does it work? josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
