On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:47:31PM -0700, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> The IBM coreconnect names are pretty well defined, it appears. In
> addition, the Xilinx versions of these IPs seem to be proliferating.
> Hence, in the future let's prefer to use the standard names. I've
> left the old names in for some backward compatibility for existing
> device trees.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you're talking about future trees, can't you just slap "simple-bus"
on them avoid this monster id table?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
