On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:34:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > >>>2. "ioport" because shift^Wstride ;-) applies only to the io range > >>> (yes, it's obvious, but worth open-wording, no?). > > >> Contrarywise, to memory range. > > >By io range I meant "I/O base", in contrast to "CTL base". > > >There is no need to apply shifting for CTL. That's why ioport-* > >appeared in the first place. > > So, a matter of wrong terminology then. The thing that you meant by > "I/O" is actually called "command block".
Yes. And IO is the second name. It's used widespread in the drivers/ide/. Now you understand why I'm so reluctant to hanging up different labels on the single thing? ;-) -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
