> Kernel space: > - irq 9 arrives from our device > - interrupts are disabled > - our kernel space micro handler is invoked > - interrupt source is checked > - if no notification is pending a signal is notificated for user space > (or a process is marked runnable) > - optionally our device interrupt generation is disabled > - handler returns > - interrupts are enabled Then why bother ? Write a minimum conventional kernel driver implementing poll() Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Balbir Singh
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers john slee
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Pavel Machek