On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Lastly an IRQ kernel module can disable_irq() from interrupt handler > > and enable it again only on explicit acknowledge from user. > > Unless you need that interrupt to be enabled to deliver the signal or let Need not. Signal and other event delivery mechanisms has nothing common with disable/enable_irq(). > userspace reenable the interrupt. "user acknowledge" is mean that. > In addition, how do you handle shared interrupts ? It is impossible, see my another message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Is it useful to support user level drivers Balbir Singh
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Tim Waugh
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Balbir Singh
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Balbir Singh
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to suppo... Pavel Machek