At 14:28 +0100 2001-06-21, Alan Cox wrote:
>No. The IRQ might be shared, and you get a slight problem if you just disabled
>an IRQ needed to make progress for user space to handle the IRQ
Two choices:
- Disallow shared interrupts for usermode drivers.
- Make the 'generic interrupt handler device driver' configurable
and/or module-extensible. You only need three entry points
("Interrupt set?"/"Enable interrupts"/"Disable interrupts"), which is
reasonably simple to get right.
--
Matthias Urlichs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Balbir Singh
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support user ... Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers john slee
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Pete Zaitcev
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers David S. Miller
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Richard B. Johnson

