On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > At 23:50 +1000 2001-06-21, john slee wrote: > >i believe libgpio uses the existing usb/iee1394/serial/parallel > >interfaces to provide a limited userspace driver capability. > > That only means, however, that the specific kernel drivers explicitly > support mid-level usermode access. > > They still handle the actual hardware state changes without usermode support. yes, that was the point. while it might be a stretch of the "mechanism, not policy" argument, i like having drivers organized this way. it makes a lot of sense for hotpluggable things like usb. j. -- "Bobby, jiggle Grandpa's rat so it looks alive, please" -- gary larson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Oliver Neukum
- Re: Is it useful to support u... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Alan Cox
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Dmitry A. Fedorov
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers john slee
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Pavel Machek
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Pete Zaitcev
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers David S. Miller
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Is it useful to support user level drivers Anders Larsen
- Re: Is it useful to support user level dri... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Is it useful to support user level... Anders Larsen