Hello Al Viro:
Is this patch correct? ;-)
Thanks.
On 10/05/2013 11:19 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Theoretically, the maximize size of "%d" or "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so
> need set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10.
>
> In real world, it may not cause issue, but still recommend to fix this
> 'theoretical' bug (especially original definition already considered
> about 'theoretical' using).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c
> index 36f6ee1..4e9a9ee 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct
> irqaction *action)
>
> #undef MAX_NAMELEN
>
> -#define MAX_NAMELEN 10
> +#define MAX_NAMELEN 11
>
> void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
>
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
