Theoretically, the maximize size of "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so need set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10, and also 'irq' is unsigned int, so need use "%u" instead of "%d".
In real world, it may not cause issue, but still recommend to fix the 'theoretical' bugs (especially original definition already considered about 'theoretical' using). Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com> --- kernel/irq/proc.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c index 36f6ee1..efda701 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c +++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action) #undef MAX_NAMELEN -#define MAX_NAMELEN 10 +#define MAX_NAMELEN 11 void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) return; memset(name, 0, MAX_NAMELEN); - sprintf(name, "%d", irq); + sprintf(name, "%u", irq); /* create /proc/irq/1234 */ desc->dir = proc_mkdir(name, root_irq_dir); -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/