Theoretically, the maximize size of "%d" or "%u" is 11 (10 + '\0'), so
need set MAX_NAMELEN 11 instead of 10.
In real world, it may not cause issue, but still recommend to fix this
'theoretical' bug (especially original definition already considered
about 'theoretical' using).
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.c...@asianux.com>
---
kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/proc.c b/kernel/irq/proc.c
index 36f6ee1..4e9a9ee 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/proc.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct
irqaction *action)
#undef MAX_NAMELEN
-#define MAX_NAMELEN 10
+#define MAX_NAMELEN 11
void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
--
1.7.7.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
