On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Raghavendra KT
<raghavendra.kt.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Ccing IBM id]
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Simple fixed value proportional backoff for ticket spinlocks.
>> By pounding on the cacheline with the spin lock less often,
>> bus traffic is reduced. In cases of a data structure with
>> embedded spinlock, the lock holder has a better chance of
>> making progress.
>>
>> If we are next in line behind the current holder of the
>> lock, we do a fast spin, so as not to waste any time when
>> the lock is released.
>>
>> The number 50 is likely to be wrong for many setups, and
>> this patch is mostly to illustrate the concept of proportional
>> backup. The next patch automatically tunes the delay value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/smp.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
>> index 20da354..9c56fe3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -117,11 +117,28 @@ static bool smp_no_nmi_ipi = false;
>> */
>> void ticket_spin_lock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock, struct __raw_tickets inc)
>> {
>> + __ticket_t head = inc.head, ticket = inc.tail;
>> + __ticket_t waiters_ahead;
>> + unsigned loops;
>> +
>> for (;;) {
>> - cpu_relax();
>> - inc.head = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head);
>> + waiters_ahead = ticket - head - 1;
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Just wondering,
> Does wraparound affects this?
The result gets stored in waiters_ahead, which is unsigned and has
same bit size as ticket and head. So, this takes care of the
wraparound issue.
In other words, you may have to add 1<<8 or 1<<16 if the integer
difference was negative; but you get that for free by just computing
the difference as a 8 or 16 bit unsigned value.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
