On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The v2 series integrates several ideas from Michel Lespinasse
> and Eric Dumazet, which should result in better throughput and
> nicer behaviour in situations with contention on multiple locks.
>
> Please let me know if you manage to break this code in any way,
> so I can fix it...

I'm seeing some very weird things on my 3 test machines. Looks like
the spinlock delay sometimes gets crazy, at which point spinlock
performance becomes unbearable and the network driver freaks out.

# ./spinlock_load_test
 1 spinlocks: 24159990
 2 spinlocks: 12900657
 3 spinlocks: 11547771
 4 spinlocks: 9113
 6 spinlocks: 259
 8 spinlocks: 310
12 spinlocks: 283
16 spinlocks:
<seems to be stuck here; meanwhile my serial console fills up with
network driver cries>

Well, I take it as an incitation to pay special attention to this code review :)

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to