On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > That's the whole crux of the matter. For something like this, you *will* > > drop data under certain circumstances. I suspect it's better to have > > this done in a controlled manner, rather than stop completely, which is > > what TCP would do. > > Why do you plan to drop data ? That seems unneccessary. If the kernel starts spewing data faster than you can send it to the far end, either the data gets dropped, or you block the kernel. Having the kernel hang waiting to send a printk to the far end seems like a bad situation... James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Werner Almesberger
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Tim Wright
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Russell King
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Pavel Machek