> I *REALLY* don't know if that is reasonable; it may have to fall into the > category of "supported but not required". Requiring an SHA hash in a > small bootstrap loader may not exactly be a reasonable expectation! tea is very very small so may be appropriate instead. > However, I think the protocol is inherently going to be asymmetric, with > as much as possible unloaded. Nod. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... Russell King
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... Pavel Machek
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... Patrick Michael Kane
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over... James Sutherland
- Re: Network console project (wa... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Network console project Jan-Benedict Glaw
- Re: Network console project (wa... Pavel Machek
- Re: Network console project (wa... Andreas Dilger
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin