> Depends on what the client can handle. For the kernel, that might be > true, but for example a boot loader may only have a few K worth of buffer > space. That same constraint is true of any UDP protocol too, and indeed any protocol not entirely based on FEC (which rather rules out ethernet based solutions) You also dont need much buffering for a smart embedded stack, its no secret that some embedded tcps dont buffer the data but pointers to constant data and values for only non constant objects. You really can make a minimal TCP very low resource. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://vger.kernel.org/lkml/
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Pavel Machek
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Werner Almesberger
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Tim Wright
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Alan Cox
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 Russell King
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: LILO and serial speeds over 9600 James Sutherland