On 2026-06-08 13:11:18 [+0800], Peng Fan wrote: > >diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c > >index 1dda1437b87f6..d1de07cc0ed62 100644 > >--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c > >+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c > >@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static int imx_mu_specific_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, > >struct imx_mu_con_priv * > > *data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR + (i % num_rr) * 4); > > } > > > >- imx_mu_xcr_set_act(priv, cp, IMX_MU_RCR, > >IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, 0)); > >+ imx_mu_xcr_set_act(priv, cp, IMX_MU_RCR, > >IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(priv->dcfg->type, cp->idx)); > > mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)priv->msg); > > For specific rx channel, whether it is i.MX8 SCU or i.MX ELE, actually there > is > only 1 channel as of now, but it seems better to use cp->idx in case more > channels in future.
Thank you for clarifying. Sebastian
