On 2026-06-03 16:18:22 [+0300], Daniel Baluta wrote: > On 6/3/26 16:05, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Move RX callback handling into the threaded handler. This is similar to > > the TX side except that we explicitly mask the source interrupt in the > > primary handler and unmask it in the threaded handler again after > > success. This was done automatically in the TX part. > > > > The masking/ unmasking can be removed from imx_mu_specific_rx() since it > > already happens in the primary/ threaded handler before invoking the > > channel specific callback. > > > > Move RX channel handling into threaded handler. > > Hi Sebastian, > > It is not very clear from me from the commit message why this change is > needed. > Can you please update the commit message with proper explanation?
The intention is to move the entire interrupt handling into the threaded handler. The primary handler masks just event, the threaded handler performs the RX/TX/ event. I move the individual events step by step so the previous patch moved the TX, here is RX and the next one does RXDB. Is this clear now? The cover later explains why this done in the first place. Sebastian
