On 6/3/26 16:20, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2026-06-03 16:18:22 [+0300], Daniel Baluta wrote: >> On 6/3/26 16:05, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >>> Move RX callback handling into the threaded handler. This is similar to >>> the TX side except that we explicitly mask the source interrupt in the >>> primary handler and unmask it in the threaded handler again after >>> success. This was done automatically in the TX part. >>> >>> The masking/ unmasking can be removed from imx_mu_specific_rx() since it >>> already happens in the primary/ threaded handler before invoking the >>> channel specific callback. >>> >>> Move RX channel handling into threaded handler. >> >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> It is not very clear from me from the commit message why this change is >> needed. >> Can you please update the commit message with proper explanation? > > The intention is to move the entire interrupt handling into the threaded > handler. The primary handler masks just event, the threaded handler > performs the RX/TX/ event. > I move the individual events step by step so the previous patch moved > the TX, here is RX and the next one does RXDB. > > Is this clear now? The cover later explains why this done in the first > place.
I would prefer to add the explanation for this in at least one commit message to be there in git log. Cover letter is not kept in git history.
