On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:22:36AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Sure, that sounds nice. > > Actually, one of the possible "grand plans" for 2.5 is a unified > "struct device". I don't know what will actually happen here. apologies for pointing out the potentially obvoius, but people might want to investigate 'newbus' while brainstorming about this: http://www.daemonnews.org/200007/newbus-intro.html -- zach - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (U... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interfac... Zach Brown
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter