From: "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 03:10:14 -0800 >Sorry, I don't like this change. Can you at least add the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE declaration and the pci_device_id table that it refers to, even if the code does not directly reference it? (You can make it as __initdata rather than __devinitdata, since it can safely be thrown away.) That was automatic PCI ID recognition will work. Feel free to send me a patch which does this. No problem. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (U... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interfac... Zach Brown
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter