Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 13:13:37 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Would you accept such a change for 2.5? Sure, that sounds nice. Actually, one of the possible "grand plans" for 2.5 is a unified "struct device". I don't know what will actually happen here. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (U... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interfac... Zach Brown
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter