>Sorry, I don't like this change. Can you at least add the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE declaration and the pci_device_id table that it refers to, even if the code does not directly reference it? (You can make it as __initdata rather than __devinitdata, since it can safely be thrown away.) That was automatic PCI ID recognition will work. Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034 +1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (U... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interfac... Zach Brown
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... David S. Miller
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Jeff Garzik
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTES... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter
- Re: sunhme.c patch for new PCI interface (UNTESTED) Adam J. Richter