On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 07:23:52PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> Hmm, the output is exactly the same as before your patch.
Bah, that patch doesn't account for the fact that we're rereading the
status field again in do_machine_check().
Ok, let's force MCi_ADDR out. Ontop:
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index c63c7ef326c7..e5580da2c491 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -240,8 +240,7 @@ static void __print_mce(struct mce *m)
}
pr_emerg(HW_ERR "TSC %llx ", m->tsc);
- if (m->addr)
- pr_cont("ADDR %llx ", m->addr);
+ pr_cont("ADDR %llx ", m->addr);
if (m->misc)
pr_cont("MISC %llx ", m->misc);
@@ -636,8 +635,9 @@ static void mce_read_aux(struct mce *m, int i)
if (m->status & MCI_STATUS_MISCV)
m->misc = mce_rdmsrl(msr_ops.misc(i));
+ m->addr = mce_rdmsrl(msr_ops.addr(i));
+
if (m->status & MCI_STATUS_ADDRV) {
- m->addr = mce_rdmsrl(msr_ops.addr(i));
/*
* Mask the reported address by the reported granularity.
---
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
