> If software than provoke your disks to think they have bad blocks, your
> disks a certainly broken. [There may be another error somewhere in linux,
> but theres at least one error in the hw.]
Agree, but still no reason to lock solid. That IS a bug.
> Pavel
>
Regards,
Igmar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Carsten Lang
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Alan Cox
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Pavel Machek
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Andries Brouwer
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Andries Brouwer

