On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote: > Here 1.4 MB is wasted on hdb because the BIOS has invented > this 1229/255/63 translation. The disk access methods on > hdb and hdc is the same. Yes, and soon CHS will go away completely with 48-bit LBA or if you CHS these large drives. I considered the making of a forced policy if you have drives beyond 80 or 100 GB but policies are pooh-poohed regardless if they are correct. Thus I will have to wait for the 137GB limit to enforce the standard and make the default CHS limited to 137GB and beyond that you have to use LBA. Cheers, Andre Hedrick The Linux ATA/IDE guy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Alan Cox
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Pavel Machek
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Andries Brouwer
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Andries Brouwer