On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Carsten Lang wrote: > i don't think that we can blame the disks! > I have 3 different drives, which produce this error after 24 hrs under heavy load. This one chokes after about 10 mins. Total meltdown. Drives are brandnew, so I doubt the failure. If I md5sum the files after eachother instead both at the same time, no errors. In case of a real disk failure, it should also bark in this case. The only difference is the load : about 1.0 in case 1 (no crash), > 2.0 in case 2 (total meltdown) Regards, Igmar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Carsten Lang
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Alan Cox
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Pavel Machek
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE related Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE relat... Andries Brouwer
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. IDE r... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Reproducable hard locks in 2.2.17. I... Andries Brouwer