On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > cat t.c > foo() > { > if (0) > bar("hhhhhhh"); > } > > gcc -O2 -c t.c > > strings t.o | grep hhh > hhhhhhh Eww... Do they _ever_ remove dead code? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integra... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about int... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how a... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Alexander Viro