Jamie Lokier writes: > Chris Wedgwood wrote: > > I think would be really cool if all this 'magic' in gcc (whatever > > part of gcc is irrelevant right now) would be exported into a library > > or shared object which editors could then load and use... dynamically > > perhaps. > > Sorry, there's a GCC policy decision against putting it into a > shared library. Why? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Current: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Jonathan Walther
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... David Woodhouse
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how abou... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integr... Nix
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Jamie Lokier