On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: > There is some facility allowing to implement this kind of things > in the C++ part of the most recent EGCS version which makes implementing > such things "relatively" easy - basiclly there is the provision to dump > the parser trees as easy to process ascii text already there. Fuck C++, by what bloody magic are you going to account for cpp? > Maybe this is a new argument to facilitate at least correct syntactical > processing of the kernel by the C++ flavour of EGCS? No, it would not. If g++ can do that, gcc also should be able to, especially by the time when we will have preprocessor BS under control in sufficient degree. Right now neither gcc nor g++ will see the large part of tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integra... Rik van Riel
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integra... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about int... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how a... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ba... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quit... Linus Torvalds