[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Dalecki) wrote on 06.09.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > > > Easy - the same way you do for cross compilation. Basically just: > > > > > > export CC=g++ --some-magic-long-option-i-dont-remember; make > > > > ... and you still have only a subset of the tree, simply because it is fed > > through cpp before it reaches the parser. And cpp cuts away many pieces. > > Different config options and you've got a different subset. Good luck > > providing the coverage. > > That's not quite the problem - with the exception of the boundary cases > of compleatly broken CONFIG_BLAH combinations... You have the fine > .confg file there you know... Count them n and take the n! for all the > possible config choices. Then you will see that THERE CAN'T be any > better > automatic approach then just what I have described above (ie. going > directly into the compiler) and doing the CONFIG_ handling by hand. > (I mean scripting for the most appriopriate choices...) Rather, then you'll see that that approach is completely unviable because the n! is a fscking unbelievable labre number. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Jonathan Walther
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... David Woodhouse