2010/5/12 Elazar Leibovich <elaz...@gmail.com> > I think you have to make a distinction between older MS software (such as > XP) and newer ones (such as 7). For example you defenitely don't run as > administrator in Windows 7, and you've got a built-in sudo like system. > I, like some people who replied, had bad experience managing Windows > machines, and it was usually viruses. However in recent versions I noticed > that even at the hands of the inexperienced users, and without any virus > scanner, the system stays relatively clean. > > The point about Windows complexity and background compatability is true and > taken. It is against security, and maybe it tips the balance against MS and > Windows related products security-wise. > > The other remark which I highly disagree is that there's no need to > convince me. I'm discussing here in order to be convinced, and I'm usually > glad when someone enlightens me. > > > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Micha Feigin <mi...@post.tau.ac.il>wrote: > >> On Tue, 11 May 2010 04:08:39 -0700 >> Elazar Leibovich <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I do not understand how a discussion about Ubuntu as a development station became into discussion about windows security and management.
-- Ori Idan
_______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
