On Tue, 11 May 2010 04:08:39 -0700 Elazar Leibovich <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not at all! > Google for "Microsoft SDL", it was not always the case, but nowadays they > have excellent security awareness. > For example, see evidence for the change here: > http://blogs.msdn.com/david_leblanc/archive/2010/04/16/don-t-use-office-rc4-encryption-really-just-don-t-do-it.aspx > Lets start with the problem that Microsoft encourages all users to be set as administrators by default. It's almost impossible to be a regular user usually and just switch momentary to administrator for small administration tasks ... Managing simple folder / file permissions is also a difficult task (doing complex permissions is complex on unix as well though) > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Gilboa Davara <gilb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:10 +0300, Elazar Leibovich wrote: > > > > > For example, Microsoft is now known for excellent security review > > > practices. Whichever MS software I choose, I can rest assured that it > > > will be relatively on the high end of security. > > > > Hidden sarcasm? > > > > - Gilboa > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-il mailing list > > Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il > > http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il > > _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
