2010/9/23 Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>: > On 22 September 2010 18:38, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> > (It occurs to me that it would be a good idea to have some automated >>> > testing of booting the daily snapshots under qemu. Do we have any >>> > infrastructure to make that easy?) >>> >>> I've been thinking the same thing, and it sounds like a job for hudson! >>> :-) let's discuss how we can do that, but I suspect we should start >>> with a daily build of qemu which would kick a daily test of the rootfs. >> >> I had been thinking about this as well, would you see more benefit for this >> to focus on testing the latest image, or qemu itself? > > I think the image (and the kernel) are going to churn at a much faster > rate than qemu will, so the benefit really is in early warning if the > kernel has suddenly tickled a latent qemu bug/missing bit of model. > (ie I think we'd want to do this test with the latest released qemu-maemo > package as well as with any new daily build of qemu.)
To overdo things, it would be nice to mix the compiler in as well. I've been planning to add a test case to the compiler build that builds the current Ubuntu kernel and boots it inside QEMU. -- Michael _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
