On 22 September 2010 18:38, Paul Larson <paul.lar...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Peter Maydell wrote: >> > (It occurs to me that it would be a good idea to have some automated >> > testing of booting the daily snapshots under qemu. Do we have any >> > infrastructure to make that easy?) >> >> I've been thinking the same thing, and it sounds like a job for hudson! >> :-) let's discuss how we can do that, but I suspect we should start >> with a daily build of qemu which would kick a daily test of the rootfs. > > I had been thinking about this as well, would you see more benefit for this > to focus on testing the latest image, or qemu itself?
I think the image (and the kernel) are going to churn at a much faster rate than qemu will, so the benefit really is in early warning if the kernel has suddenly tickled a latent qemu bug/missing bit of model. (ie I think we'd want to do this test with the latest released qemu-maemo package as well as with any new daily build of qemu.) For changes to qemu itself, it would be good if there was an easy way to test a proposed new qemu package to check that it still booted the last release and the latest snapshot. I guess if we push changes to git and do a daily build from that then that will handle that side of it. -- PMM _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
