On 6. Juli 2014 16:12:56 MESZ, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> wrote:
>Uns Liska wrote
>> Some of them are good, some of them less so, I think.
>> Maybe we could start going through the existing snippets and consider
>
>> possible tags for each of them. This will make a pool of suggestions 
>> where we can filter out from.
>> 
>> One question I still have is: Should the tags be flat too, i.e.
>single 
>> independent tags, or could there also be a hierarchy (which would
>then 
>> be reflected in the documentation)?
>> 
>> For example I could imagine tagging a snippet
>> markup->headers or
>> notation->rhythm->polymetrics
>
>I think non-hierarchical (flat) tags make sense, following the
>principle of
>doing the simplest thing that will do the job, in this case helping
>people
>find the files/snippets they're interested in.  
>
>Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me.

But not tagging directly but collecting suggestions first. Then decide about a 
set of tags and apply them during the move.

Urs
>
>-Paul
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/openlilylib-Discuss-restructuring-tp163922p164079.html
>Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to