On 6. Juli 2014 16:12:56 MESZ, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> wrote: >Uns Liska wrote >> Some of them are good, some of them less so, I think. >> Maybe we could start going through the existing snippets and consider > >> possible tags for each of them. This will make a pool of suggestions >> where we can filter out from. >> >> One question I still have is: Should the tags be flat too, i.e. >single >> independent tags, or could there also be a hierarchy (which would >then >> be reflected in the documentation)? >> >> For example I could imagine tagging a snippet >> markup->headers or >> notation->rhythm->polymetrics > >I think non-hierarchical (flat) tags make sense, following the >principle of >doing the simplest thing that will do the job, in this case helping >people >find the files/snippets they're interested in. > >Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me.
But not tagging directly but collecting suggestions first. Then decide about a set of tags and apply them during the move. Urs > >-Paul > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/openlilylib-Discuss-restructuring-tp163922p164079.html >Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
