Uns Liska wrote > Some of them are good, some of them less so, I think. > Maybe we could start going through the existing snippets and consider > possible tags for each of them. This will make a pool of suggestions > where we can filter out from. > > One question I still have is: Should the tags be flat too, i.e. single > independent tags, or could there also be a hierarchy (which would then > be reflected in the documentation)? > > For example I could imagine tagging a snippet > markup->headers or > notation->rhythm->polymetrics
I think non-hierarchical (flat) tags make sense, following the principle of doing the simplest thing that will do the job, in this case helping people find the files/snippets they're interested in. Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me. -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/openlilylib-Discuss-restructuring-tp163922p164079.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
